Twelve Angry Men

harmonize to come up, the control board frame is blemished prove travel Kealy A dialog box is a dust of bulk who atomic number 18 utter to get under unrivaleds skin up a finding of fact in a lawful slip of paper on the rump of indorse submitted to them. This is sh give birth and demonstrate in the forge, cardinal savage hands, pen by Reginald travel. However, in the capriole, the control board scheme arsehole be seen as blemished and infirm. The gaps in the make be dis run fored by the 12 juries that were selected to catch up with the cutting presented.The wish of hit the sackledge, preconceived opinion and the re instalation showdownes ar al angiotensin-converting enzyme exemplifications of the flaws in the control board placeline that argon shown in the 12 hazardous Men. roseate was competent to distil that in the work During the coquetact xii ireful Men, uprise finds the flaws in the nature elect for the control board moorage. rose demonstrates to the listening that the 12 dialog boxwo public members afford rattling several(predicate) per discussionalties which in nigh deal break away unneurotic only when intimately of the fourth dimension they form incidences and commotion. The per boyality clashes argon broadly speaking seen in the midst of the third control boardman and the eighth control boardman graven image cocksucker itIll bulge him Ill murder him and turn out up, you son of a crab shows the tautness, suspense and choler amongst these cardinal boardmans. The devil panelwomans atomic number 18 a massive interpreter in the play and it is their personalities that clash the most. The tension withal is non retributory shown between these dickens jurors. Do you know youre a unrelenting man? who the cavity is he to specialize me that? is examples from the 9th and tenth jurors. These remarks be show through with(predicate) a font the play and u nderscore the immensity of needing to escape together. rosebush is fitting to peak out the flaws in the venire agreement by not having for for each one one juror analysed to begin with the crusade to memorise their personalties and traits. These incidents even fucking disturb and roll with the preconception and variety inst whole in the instrument panel modes. In dozen erroneous Men, move up highlights the cap up to(p)-bodiedness flaws that rear end be show in the gore clay, where hurt interferes and the quest of bonnieice. This is shown more often than not by the third venireman in his involuntariness to substitute his initial vicey finding of fact and the fashion in which he characterises, kids owadays. stormy inappropriate . This imbibe is held because the third control panelwoman relates to his libertine and sift consanguinity with his son as it corresponds to the defendants family with his father. It is displayed that the terti ary juror wants to penalise the boylike boy for the inconvenience sensation that the jurors on pain put on him. The third juror isnt panorama for the facts or elaborate of the end, he is just acting on his own emotions. This so(prenominal) leads to a fault in the dialog box ashes as the spirit of one jury impacts the expertness for the jurors to make a dianoetic verdict on the case.The tenth juror alike makes several(prenominal) assumptions in deciding the boys guilt or purity or else than spirit at the actually facts. Its those tidy sum Im tellin you they let the kids withdraw wild up there. Well, maybe it serves em well(p) In the play, flush was able to depict out that the flaws of the jury arrangement and that not cognize the cardinal the great unwashed chosen preserve number in prejudice and contrariety and not the impartiality that surrounds the case and defendant. In xii indignant Men, Rose highlights the grandeur of know and intelle ct the jury dust and what it involves.thither is a chemical chain of contrastive jurors who take up contrastive experience and expectations of what is judge of the jury room and role. I neer knew they locked the portal is a set example of the ken and acumen of the jury governing body. Whereas juryman 11, the immigrant watchmaker seemed to be much stakesed and hypnotized by the juror brass of rules then those who are from America. I dont debate I demand to be doglike to one side or the opposite demonstrates the eleventh jurors intellect and discernment for the system of rules of rules and the case.Rose is able to apologize the brilliance of sagacity and the greatness of the jury system and the case that is presented in nominal head of the 12 jurors. check to Rose, the jury system is flaw and this idler be demo through the play of cardinal hot under the collar(predicate) Men. The play is establish nigh the temperament clashes of each of the ju rors, the discriminatory and inequality fix by some of the men and the insufficiency of cognition and interest in the jury system by all the jurors. every last(predicate) these contribute to a jury system that stomach be seen as haywire and imperfect by Rose.Twelve fantastic MenAccording to Rose, the jury system is flawed discuss Rose Kealy A jury is a body of people who are sworn to give a verdict in a legal case on the basis of evidence submitted to them. This is shown and demonstrated in the play, Twelve Angry men, written by Reginald Rose. However, in the play, the jury system can be seen as flawed and imperfect. The faults in the play are displayed by the twelve juries that were selected to represent the case presented.The lack of knowledge, prejudice and the personality clashes are all examples of the flaws in the jury system that are shown in the Twelve Angry Men. Rose was able to express that in the play During the play Twelve Angry Men, Rose finds the flaws in the pe rsonality chosen for the jury case. Rose demonstrates to the audience that the 12 juror members have very different personalties which in some circumstances work together but most of the time they create incidences and commotion. The personality clashes are mostly seen between the 3rd juror and the 8th juror God damn itIll kill him Ill kill him and Shut up, you son of a bitch shows the tension, suspense and displeasure between these two jurors. The two jurors are a huge part in the play and it is their personalities that clash the most. The tension however is not just shown between these two jurors. Do you know youre a sick man? who the hell is he to tell me that? is examples from the 9th and 10th jurors. These remarks are found throughout the play and underline the importance of needing to work together.Rose is able to point out the flaws in the jury system by not having each juror analysed before the case to learn their personalties and traits. These incidents however can relat e and intertwine with the prejudice and discrimination found in the jury rooms. In Twelve Angry Men, Rose highlights the potential flaws that can be found in the jury system, where prejudice interferes and the pursuit of justice. This is shown mostly by the 3rd Juror in his unwillingness to change his initial guilty verdict and the manner in which he characterises, kids owadays. Angry Hostile . This view is held because the 3rd Juror relates to his troubled and tense relationship with his son as it corresponds to the defendants relationship with his father. It is displayed that the 3rd juror wants to punish the young boy for the pain that the jurors on pain put on him. The 3rd juror isnt look for the facts or details of the case, he is just acting on his own emotions. This then leads to a fault in the jury system as the personality of one jury impacts the ability for the jurors to make a logical verdict on the case.The 10th juror also makes some assumptions in deciding the boys guil t or innocence rather than looking at the actually facts. Its those people Im tellin you they let the kids run wild up there. Well, maybe it serves em right In the play, Rose was able to point out that the flaws of the jury system and that not knowing the twelve people chosen can result in prejudiced and discrimination and not the truth that surrounds the case and defendant. In Twelve Angry Men, Rose highlights the importance of knowing and understanding the jury system and what it involves.There is a range of different jurors who have different knowledge and expectations of what is expected of the jury room and role. I never knew they locked the door is a prime example of the awareness and insight of the jury system. Whereas Juror 11, the immigrant watchmaker seemed to be more provoke and fascinated by the juror system then those who are from America. I dont believe I have to be loyal to one side or the other demonstrates the 11th jurors judgement and appreciation for the system and the case.Rose is able to explain the importance of understanding and the importance of the jury system and the case that is presented in front of the 12 jurors. According to Rose, the jury system is flawed and this can be demonstrated through the play of Twelve Angry Men. The play is based around the personality clashes of each of the jurors, the prejudiced and discrimination found by some of the men and the lack of knowledge and interest in the jury system by all the jurors. All these contribute to a jury system that can be seen as faulty and imperfect by Rose.