FINAL Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

FINAL - Essay ExampleThe moral structure of discretion remain essentially the same for all officials because they are all charged to obey and implement the law and respect legal process in exercising their baron and judgment (Victoria 1). Discretion is involved in every matter of professional life for a street-level regimen employee. A front line incumbent is unremarkably more involved in dealing with public matters because he/she has to deal with public more than the higher ranked officials do. A front line government officer should exercise his/her discretion in resolving public matters instead of sending every elementary case to higher authorities. For example, a police officer should have the power to decide whether he/she should resolve a conflicting situation on his/her own or he/she should send the case to the accost to decide on it. However, it depends on the nature of the case. If a case is not very complex and both conflicting parties come to the police officer to p urpose a solution for them, then the police officer should make the finish on his/her own. Such discretions in day-after-day work not only conjure up the ability of front line government offices to the critical decisions but also reduce the load of work for the government agencies. For example, if a police officer resolves simple conflicts between people on his/her own, it will reduce the work load for the court which is usually already burdened with a number of cases. However, sometimes discretion in day-today activities does not work well for the society. The resolve is that the reasoning and logic that a person at a higher level can give think to public administration matters is different from the mindset of a person working as a front line government employee. Higher appointments are through based on the level of qualification and intellectual ability of people. Such people can take wise decisions by looking all aspects of matters. For example, a decision that a judge can take is more wise and merit-based than the decision that a front line police officer takes. Similarly, a decision that the manager of an organization can take for employees is more applicable and rational as compared to the decision that an employee takes for his/her work. Therefore, we can say that the consequences if street-level bureaucrats have discretion in their day-to-day activities vary from case to case. However, the negative consequences are not able to overcome the benefits associated with discretion to day-to-day works, such as, enhanced intellectual ability and reduced workload for government agencies. Every elected, appointed, and career official must exercise judgment and discretion in carrying out the duties and responsibilities of office (Victoria 1). Part B The fundamental precondition of administrative reformers in the late 1800s and early 1900s that politics could have only adverse effects on administration was true up to some extent. The reason is that the poli tics of that time had incorporated such elements which could have disturbed the administrative approaches and systems of almost every department. Some of such elements included thirst of power, reducing the rights of others, and governmental instability. All of these elements played their roles in running the political matters of Central European countries. Such elements could have broken the